Total Pageviews

Tuesday, 17 February 2015

The Annals of Surgery study

Since DBO, DFO, etc LOVE LOVE LOVE to quote this study we thought we’d share this with you.
It’s been debunked. Soundly.
annals of surgery
You can read about it here:
“When Bini and Cohn’s errors were directly addressed in a published letter to the editor of the Annals of Surgery, May 2012 issue, Bini and Cohn did not respond to a single specific or documented error, except to say, ‘we make no claim on being veterinary or forensic experts.“
This is what happens when non-professionals try to fake it. Just like Colleen Lynn, Bogart, Billy the Bartender, Pame Ashley, Merritt Clifton, Savage and all the rest of these flakes flap their gums. Nothing they say holds water.

One thought on “The Annals of Surgery study”

  1. Mary Olson
    The Mawwwwl Talk Manual my favorite source for education on canine safety you will ever need… LMAO!!
    and the “pittie party” that’s a good one … because it describes DBO and her members to a T…
    Ms. Lynn’s list of invented words and her made-up definitions should have caused very serious concern as to the reliability of her claims, “data” and bias:
    Maul Talk Manual / Words invented by Dogsbite.org / Colleen Lynn
    Pitiology: Ms. Lynn describes, “Pitiology is a term derived from the DogsBite.org community. It refers to the study of pit bull owners by animal groups and behaviorists bent upon pitying and sympathizing with these owners.”
    Pitiot: Ms. Lynn states that, “Like the terms piticide and and pitricide, derived from members of the DogsBite.org community, “pitiot” combines two words to make a new one with meaning specific to the pit bull problem and the pit bull community… describing a pit bull owner “idiot..”
    Pitplexia: Here Ms. Lynn credits a website fan named, Dude, I BaggedYourPit for coming up with this term to describe an inability to identify a pit bull, or belief that a pit bull cannot be identified by appearance. She goes on to say that “Pitplexic Disorder is a symptom and diagnostic indicator for Pitthetic Dementia.”
    Pittie party: Ms. Lynn describes how she came to invent the word “pittie party” as the union of pittie and “pity party,” and is used to describe pit bull apologists who are trying to drum up sympathy (a pity party) for their pit bulls and themselves.”
    Ugly dog: Ms. Lynn describes “Ugly dog” is a term conceived by blogger Craven Desires to describe all pit bulls. She goes on to say that, “To be sure, pit bulls are ugly dogs, and they maul to death countless adorable dogs.”
    The list goes on to include dozens of other strange and disturbing terms invented by Ms. Lynn, including: Pit nutter, post-nutter, pre-nutter, pithole, piticide, pitricide, pitthetic dementia, pitplexic disorder and others invented by Ms. Lynn to describe pit bulls, pit bull owners, pit bull advocates and the “conditions they suffer from.”
    “Science Whores”
    Of all the terms invented by Ms. Lynn (Dogsbite.org) to insult and degrade “pit bulls” and their owners, the term that should have caused Dr. Bini, his collaborators, and the staff of the Annals of Surgery, the most concern was the term “science whore,” to describe their Veterinary counterparts who happened to have made statements about “pit bulls” in which Ms. Lynn found disagreeable.
    I shall not link to or list the names of the distinguished veterinarians and veterinarian behaviorists who Ms. Lynn referred to as “science whores” on her website because they had the audacity not to demonize or say negative things about “pit bulls.” Suffice it to say, these insults can be easily found on her website.
Posted by at

No comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)